Antonín Dvořák (Czech; 1841-1904)—Piano Quintet No. 2, Op. 81 (1887)
- Allegro, ma non tanto
- Dumka: Andante con moto
- Scherzo: Molto vivace (Furiant)
- Finale: Allegro
Dvořák’s first work to receive a public performance was his Piano Quintet No. 1 in A major, Opus 5, in 1872. He was scraping by as a provincial composer unknown outside of Prague. His international reputation ballooned as he developed a voice that blended the Romantic lyricism of his famous Austrian and German counterparts with his Bohemian identity.
In 1887, he returned to his first piano quintet, but having abandoned it, had to ask a friend for a copy of the score. His revisions weren’t performed for nearly two decades after his death, but the project inspired a second quintet in A major. Opus 81 was premiered in Prague in 1888, and had the touch of a more mature Dvořák, and quickly gained a reputation as a repertoire staple.
The cello sings a stately baritone melody over a gently rocking piano, and together, they descend into an aggressive forte with the whole ensemble. Dvořák sticks with the routine of sonata form, but feels it rhapsodic. With creative harmonic transitions and unending melodic ideas, the music pours out, organically evolving through wide-ranging moods. The exposition blends seamlessly into the generous development that covers the gamut of rhythmic reconfigurations, climactically arriving at the original melody, satisfyingly filled out by the whole ensemble.
For centuries, minstrels traveled the Ukrainian countryside with lutes (the kobzar), performing sung epics called duma (plural dummy, diminutive dumka). Ethnographical work on the topic in the 1870s brought the genre to the attention of Dvořák, who prolifically incorporated original “dumkas” into his works, imbuing his voice with an appealing Slavic tone. Here, the viola presents the plodding melody as the piano provides the ornate lute-like accompaniment. The contrasting section provides a wistful reprieve.
The most common translation of “furiant” is fiery, but a more nuanced description may be “swagger” or “confidence.” The exciting Bohemian men’s folk dance alternates beat patterns of twos and threes, and Dvořák often paired it with the dumka to create a lively contrast, stylizing it as a triple-meter scherzo with surprising accent patterns. The vibrant approach here transports the listener to a rural village setting, with the calming tranquillo section evoking the natural beauty of the Bohemian countryside.
The spirited finale is flush with melodic play and even includes a developmental fugue. Dvořák navigates his identity throughout the work, with the inner movements effectively exploring national identity, and the outer movements demonstrating craft within the parameters of the classical canon. Certainly, each movement is expertly crafted, but the arch is carefully considered to softly demonstrate his nationalism with appeal to international audiences, adroitly balancing exoticism and familiarity with exceedingly technical competence.